OK, I'm not sure what's happening but I've been drinking on a regular basis. This is really nothing to get startled about because I have been drinking a half a bottle of beer at a time. It's just wasteful. Don't you think? It doesn't help with writing, but it does go well with certain foods, like tacos on the back deck.
I have had an interesting evolution since being out of the office for a couple weeks due to a minor surgery. I have rested, achieved a certain kind of perspective, and mellowed out. I think I called it a passive optimism. This is good. Ultimately, I'm more focused on feeling good lately which has led to my partial beer drinking and other things that actually are good for me... like eating more fruit, hydrating, and "working out" (please take note of the quotation marks, these are air quotes, interpret as you will)
As I consider the hero(es) of my next script, it has become obvious that I haven't been sure if the hero is all hero all the time, or a reluctant hero. And I think that, finally, I have come to the conclusion that I have one of each. It won't manifest as anything like it, but consider the dynamic between Luke Skywalker and Han Solo.
Luke: "I'm all hero all the time, just get me off this planet."
Han Solo: "Who me? A hero? Just give me the money, alright?"
In this case it is looking like father and son, or maybe boy and girl. I don't think it will play as interestingly if they are both reluctant heroes. There is less to play off of. I might even add to that dynamic... Obiwan Kenobi: Failed Heroic Archetype - a Hero's Hero if you will.
No, I'm not sure that's how you spell kenobi.
Now I must digress into the need for research in a scifi script. I have to admit that it's fun to make things up in the wholly creative way that is allowed in scifi. However, you have to be careful to make things up that show you understand the current scientific thinking on the topic or you get called wrong by scientists. I know this because my parents are all scientists -- all three (gotta love a blended family).
And, the science has to make sense - I know this because I have sat in more than one theater in which fellow viewers blurt out their incredulity at the inconsistent turn the science has taken. That is to say that it needs to be cohesive unto itself within the work and a construct out of science as we know and expect it in the future.
If you are making a bigger leap than that, it needs extensive support and explanation. I think this is why so many scifi works start with an extensive voice over and/or text to get the fiction straight in the heads of the viewers.
I have been watching my scifi marathon and I still don't have a conclusion on the voice over or not to voice over conundrum, but a decision is coming soon... watch this space... closely...